I get lots of great questions by email and public comments on various threads. I received this one, on why I bother to write when I don’t hold religious beliefs anymore, from a good friend in a comment to another essay. As I began answering, I felt this also should probably receive its own post. Here’s the entire question, quoted verbatim:
What perplexes me though, is why bother discussing Christianity in particular or any other religious system when you state quite clearly that Christians often lean on “faith” rather than reason. Knowing this, why feel compelled to defend your position, or persuade them differently?
Why make it a mission in a sense to discuss the views of people who want to believe in God, when you have turned to free thought reasoning and being agnostic? It’s like continuing to talk about an x-wife or former girlfriend for years and years after the relationship has ended. People do it, but there is no freedom in it.
I can only imagine (since I do likewise), that you have spent an enormous amount of brain energy contemplating and reasoning through everything you have discussed in this blog post. You spent hours writing it out, being selective in your wording, examples and illustrations. But I am perplexed why any of it was worth your time and efforts if you no longer believe any of it, and those who believe it are going to continue believing it. Seems you would be more successful discussing closer to where your at with people who are where your at.
Great questions. Thanks for asking. On the fly, I can list a few reasons why I write this stuff. There are probably other reasons, but here are the biggest ones, I think. I wrote this in one sitting, and I might add to it later, or modify it if I think I can more accurately express my thinking or if something else comes to mind.
1 ) People ask me what I believe and why. I figure they’re due an answer. They then begin to ask about and challenge my assumptions. I expand on that too.
2 ) I would like to help people. I have been on the evangelical Christian side of things and I know the secret doubts, double binds, paradoxes, inconsistencies and fears that believers harbor. I want to give a voice to those and to let people know and SEE that it’s ok to doubt, question and even reject beliefs, dogma and sacred cows where appropriate.
3 ) Religion is not harmless. Fewer than 40% of Americans accept evolution as factual and that statistic is directly related to church attendance and level of education. Here’s the link. Be sure to check out the “Related Items” on the right hand side. These beliefs are held by people who want to sit on school boards and decide what goes into science texts. I believe that’s contrary to good science, that it will harm us economically in the future by not giving children a solid foundation in science (thus harming them also and handicapping them in a competitive job market) and that it must be proactively opposed.
4 ) Religion is not harmless. To the degree to which people believe that things like homosexuality and same sex marriage are “sins” they will reflect that belief in their voting choices and they will teach it in the pulpit. They do so as a matter of faith, without scientific objectivity at all to substantiate the idea that same sex marriage is harmful (and this is only one of many examples, but I believe it is one of the greatest civil rights questions of our day) and with no justification other than scripture and religious authority. I believe such views are discriminatory and must be proactively opposed.
5 ) I too am interested in the world and universe I live in. If I lived in say, India, perhaps my writing might be directed more towards Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims. But I live here, and as much of the ongoing conversation is religious, and takes place in the public forum I would like to be part of the conversation. Keep in mind also that religion is not harmless. Presidential candidate Rick Perry explicitly says “‘Christian values’ should be given supremacy over other religions in guiding the U.S. government.” Michele Bachman, whether she was truly joking or not said that the earthquake and hurricane in Virginia were sent by God so that we would “get the message.” This is all part of the world I live in and I have something to say about it.
6 ) There are dear friends of mine who have encouraged me, with a good deal of resistance on my part initially, to talk about what I believe and tell my story. In fact there are some friends who have been stern with me on that and felt I actually had a moral obligation to do so after years of promoting evangelical fundamentalism. I ignored all this at first until getting a Facebook account, when it became impossible NOT to talk about. I think my friends might have a point.
7 ) I want to help people. I get lots of email, not publicly visible of course, from people who are very grateful that I am writing what I write. It strengthens them, gives them hope, welcomes them back into the human race. People who do not believe in God are often seen as immoral, evil, lawless, receive death threats because of their unbelief, cannot yet be elected to high office, etc.). Such views are outrageous and must be assertively opposed. Even people who want to continue to believe are grateful that I and many others are giving voice to their inner thoughts, doubts and fears.
When I used to attend Calvary Chapel, there were (and probably still are) a number of the pastors that liked this little line; “Some tell me my religion is a crutch. No, it’s not a crutch, it’s a whole stretcher!” There are some people whose lives will truly fall apart, implode without their religion. I’ve seen that over and over. It’s the new wine in old wineskins thing – some people will just burst. It seems especially true where people have histories of addictions and mental illnesses of various sorts. Some established and popular Christian musicians even appeal to those illnesses and addictions in their message offering Jesus as “the only cure.” I feel for such people. I am tempted to say that people in that category should not read posts such as mine, but there’s another side of me that thinks they absolutely should, that whether they agree with me or not, they should continue moving into health independent of their worldview. I do not want to see people suffer. I do want them to know that they don’t need theological crutches or stretchers to be whole and healthy. There are better courses of treatment.
8 ) I write because I believe that the kind of faith you refer to in your question, the kind that’s on the other end of a continuum with “reason” is not necessarily a good thing especially when it gets in the way of understanding the world as it really is. When I talk about “the world as it really is,” I am talking about versions of reality that are supported by testable, replicable, verifiable results (see the point above on science and evolution, for example). For everything that is not, I hold that it’s most reasonable to be agnostic rather than selling out to articles of faith.
I also want to show people, especially people who believe there is no alternative, that there is in fact a very robust, beautiful and whole alternative to faith. For me that alternative has made all the difference in my life. I am happier, things make much more sense, I feel I have a better moral foundation, I feel life is much more meaningful, I love more fully and deeply. Now there are people who will reject this outright and stick with faith. That’s fine. There are others who will see it as a breath of fresh air. My goal is not to destroy people’s beliefs. I am simply saying, “I don’t see that the emperor is wearing any clothes,” because I’ve changed the way I evaluate claims made about the world we live in. I no longer do so based only on faith or religious authority.
Let’s be clear about one thing; I am not on a mission to de-convert people, but having said that, not all people will continue to believe! This is borne out in the numbers, and while the ultra-religious will see this simply as part of the great apostasy foretold in scripture (which has been posited over and over again throughout the ages in a dizzying number of ways – check the link – enough to render it meaningless to me), I see it only as holding faith’s feet to the fire. If anyone, any faith, any authority wants to take their transcendent, ecstatic religious experiences and their theologies and extrapolate them, making objective claims about facts and the world we live in, then they will have to support those claims as we would expect support for any other claims. Rome no longer rules the world and the days of deference to religious authority are over.
We trust cardiologists to render us unconscious, rip our chests open with saws and knives, actually stop our hearts, cut away at arteries and all kinds of other stuff because we trust their training, what they know, the studying and research they’ve done, the clinical trials of the practices, procedures and technologies they use and the drugs they prescribe, and the past results of similar procedures. We do not trust them because of their theology or what their faith tells them.
9 ) I write because I am on my own journey, my own quest to understand my world and writing it down is my way of journaling it. I don’t see it as defending my position, but as sharing, explaining and clarifying (even to myself) what I believe. I’m happy to do so.